|
In 1959, after a first teaching experience at
the Académie Montmartre in Paris - directed by Fernand Léger
-, J.D. accepted a teaching post at the Akademie der bildenden
Kiinste in Munich. According to former students, his teaching more
akin to initiation than to lecturing, came within the province of
maieutics. " He was not a conventional teacher, but rather
a guide, an adviser, a friend. " (Comby).
| " Most of his students enjoyed a good education,
because they felt that to him, theory and practice were but
one. He looked extremely well after every student and
if the discussions were in groups, he would talk in private
with anyone who seemed not so much at ease. " |
|
As a matter of fact,
J.D. passed on the lesson of rigour and freedom given by
Paul Sérusier - who twenty
years before, had helped him to find his personal way - and enhanced
by his own experience. He tried to make his students discover
their own means of expression, without influencing them, nor imposing
any specific tenet. Unlike the rest of the academy (where
most students usually paint like their teacher) J.D's group
of students followed different artistic trends. As far as
colour was concerned, J.D. recommended to study the " chromatic
circle " treasured by the Nabi painter rather than the methods developed
more recently by the Bauhaus theoreticians, such as Johannes Itten
or Josef Albers. In short, by his teaching, J.D. revealed
a major element of the painter's relationship to his work:
| " It would be ideal if I succeeded in helping
my students not only to become " painting technicians ", but
also people so highly conscious of the prodigality of Nature,
so eager to observe it that its study is no longer frightening.
" [J.D. to Georges Adam, 1962]. |
|